![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
« What you didn't hear on CNN | Main | A Brief Note from Augustine » May 6, 2005
Feith Indirectly Confirms British Memo
Yesterday I posted on the British memo that provides evidence that the Bush administration, and even the President directly, decided to make the Weapons of Mass Destruction a front for a war for regime change in Iraq. Interestingly, an article in the latest New Yorker, an interview with Douglas Feith, indirectly confirms what the British memo states(www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/050509fa_fact). In the article Feith states about the Iraq War: "The main rationale [for the war] was not bassed on intelligence . . . It was known to anyone who read newspapers and knew history. Saddam had used nerve gas, he had invaded his neighbors more than once, he had attacked other neighbors, he was hostile to us [the United States?], he supported numerous terrorist groups. It's true that he didn't have a link that we know of to 9/11 . . . . But he did give safe haven to terrorists. . . . Given the ease, as everybody knows, with which one can reconstitute stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons if you have the capabilities which he had, I don'think the rationale for war hinged on the existence of stockpiles." Here again is basically an admission that policy, not intelligence, drove the the Bush decision to invade Iraq. Intelligence was then shaped around the obvious "facts" and "history" to provide a public relations rationale for the war. This is exactly the same perspective as given by the British memo released last weekend. I think what is most disturbing to me is that both the author of the article and Feith can only think in terms of the impact of the war on the United States. The decimation of Iraq and the Iraqi people does not even appear on the moral horizon. We mustn't forget that the decimation of the Iraqi people continues. This is not the "Culture of Life" that John Paul II talked about, but rather, the "Culture of Death."
Posted by johnwright at May 6, 2005 8:02 AM Comments
Joe Conason at Salon has something relevant to add to this as well: ************ May 6, 2005 | Are Americans so jaded about the deceptions perpetrated by our own government to lead us into war in Iraq that we are no longer interested in fresh and damning evidence of those lies? Or are the editors and producers who oversee the American news industry simply too timid to report that proof on the evening broadcasts and front pages? There is a "smoking memo" that confirms the worst assumptions about the Bush administration's Iraq policy, but although that memo generated huge pre-election headlines in Britain, its existence has hardly been mentioned here. ... What the minutes clearly show is that Bush and Blair secretly agreed to wage war for "regime change" nearly a year before the invasion -- and months before they asked the United Nations Security Council to support renewed weapons inspections as an alternative to armed conflict. The minutes also reveal the lingering doubts over the legal and moral justifications for war within the Blair government. But for Americans, the most important lines in the July 23 minutes are those attributed to Sir Richard Dearlove, the head of the British Secret Intelligence Service, or MI6, who in spy jargon is to be referred to only as "C." The minutes indicate that Sir Richard had discovered certain harsh realities during a visit to the United States that summer: "C reported on his recent talks in Washington. There was a perceptible shift in attitude. Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy. The NSC had no patience with the U.N. route ... There was little discussion in Washington of the aftermath after military action." ************************ We've known this stuff all along. What will it take for people's ears to park up this time? Posted by: Eric Lee at May 6, 2005 12:50 PM Juan Cole's analysis is spot-on, as usual: http://www.juancole.com/2005/05/secret-british-memo-shows-bush.html Posted by: Eric Lee at May 6, 2005 4:22 PM Thank you for pointing out the hypocrisy of these so called proponents of the culture of life. I'm reminded of Bush's remarks during the Schiavo mess that we should always err on the side of life. I don't think that's exactly what's happening here, nor did it happen in Texas as Bush set records for executions. And thank you again for reminding us that suffering does not occur only on the American side of war, even though the MSM does all it can to cover the suffering caused by our actions. Reflecting upon the Rwandan genocide and the atrocities in Sudan these days, I keep remembering the phrase "never again". We said that at after the Holocaust. Then we said it after sitting by during genocides in Yugoslavia and Rwanda. I'm sure in a decade we'll same about Darfuf. What would it take for us to say that about these atrocities in Iraq. What is it that keeps we humans bound within the cycle of violence? Posted by: Matthew David Alexander at May 7, 2005 2:16 PM Sin. Self-centerednes. So again, sin. (Though the complexity of the world probably figures into this as well.) Posted by: Kevin Timpe at May 11, 2005 11:17 AM Dear Posted by: Evangelist Peter Yelchuri at November 8, 2005 8:50 PM peter yelchuri from india is a writing mails to foreign donors to cheat them showing bogus ministry. ploease donot believe them any more. this is my advise to all. y. paparao. missions to the nations. Posted by: paparao at December 20, 2007 8:36 AM Dear Friends Y. Papa Rao is my Blood Brother, I read Papa Rao's Comments and I hurted, because I am doing One orphanage and Disabled Children Home and other charity work, I met My brother Papa rao and i GREET HIM on Christmas Day 2007 and also I met hin on new year 2008 with all my family.please try to undrestand my grief. thank you very much. Posted by: Peter yelchuri at February 6, 2008 1:00 AM Dear Readers, Paparao Posted by: Paparao at March 10, 2008 7:18 PM The above peter was as worest as donky. prostitute alkaholic and as bad as non Posted by: nagaraju at March 18, 2008 6:18 AM Dearest in Christ, Posted by: rita solomon at May 22, 2008 3:08 AM Paparao Yelchuri is very intelligent to collect huge funds from donors from america and other big countries. He is cheaing all of you who are helping his worthless ministry work. He ministry is very secrete in Kakianda but His money is great. he is a very wealthy man in kakianda. he cheats pastors in kakinada also. He ministry is very secrete to the people of kakinada but very open to the donors by his writings. Please donot believe him at all. This is my sincere request. Posted by: kakinada churches at July 17, 2008 1:06 AM Post a comment
|
Archives
Recent Entries
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||