Pastor John Wright

« Vacation and War | Main | Hope for the Future: Balthasar and Barth »

August 9, 2006

Eating Bread

The order in which we hear these passages make a big difference. Do the OT and Epistle readings lead to and "activate" the Gospel reading or is it the Gospel reading that elevates and enables and illuminates the OT and Epistle reading? Let me explain.

If one begins with the OT, moves into the Epistle, and then to the Eucharistic images of the Gospel of John, the Eucharist, Jesus present as bread to eat, becomes the result of the social reality of the human community that we produced through our obedience. Community becomes more basic than Christ's Eucharistic presence. Christ's presence in the sacrament is fundamentally memorial, not real -- or real because it's memorial. Christ is manifested in the church as the gather at the Table. This is a common way that people from radical Protestant groups such as Mennonites tend to live such readings.

While there is some truth to this understanding, this is a very dangerous for a congregation's practice of life together celebrated in Jesus as Bread. Such an understanding makes the Christ's presence in the Eucharist the result of the church as community as a type of incubation ritual. As the church, we make Christ present to the world. Works produce grace; humans make God. The Eucharist becomes something like rituals understood by an important French sociologist Emile Durkheim who argued that "rituals" provide the unifying projection of communities -- the church makes the Eucharist through its solidarity. It reduces the Eucharist to a sociological reality; if this sociological reality is not there, the Eucharist is not valid because it cannot symbolize the unity of the community.

But the church does not make the Eucharist; the Eucharist makes the Church. As Christians, grace comes before works, and works flow out of what the grace has already accomplished. The Eucharist represents the "already" as we live towards its full reality in the "not yet." Christ's presence in the Eucharist is real by the descent of the Spirit on the Bread and Cup in the Eucharistic prayer lead by the elder at the altar. As we participate in the One Body that is Christ's presence in the Bread, we then go out to live what we read in Deuteronomy and Ephesians -- now with no reason to not do so, because it is only by God's grace, not our merit or worth, that we have been made participatants in Christ's body.

This may sound esoteric, but it is important for us. By placing an emphasis on "community" as lived in the "Eucharist", we subtly shift the center of the faith to human relationships and demands that are made upon each other. Community becomes more central than Christ, as Christ's presence depends on community. Ironically, it makes community much more difficult to live out because we spend energy trying to keep everyone's demands met, rather than living for the presence of Christ among the poor in direct action. We can fragment because of disappointments of "lack of community" end up severing the community. In the culture of white middle class America, community bears psychological therapeutic weight for getting through "tough times" or for having me recognized for the gifts that I bring into a group of people. Community is forced to be its own end, and cannot bear the weight of the expectations.

The Good News is that the Church as a community is a a reality already formed in Christ's presence in the Eucharist. It is not formed for its own sake, but for the sake of Christ's presence found as we engage in the works of mercy in witness to the world. In other words, the social reality of the church as community happens, whether we actualize it or not, in the
Bread that is Jesus Christ is the Eucharist. The community is a necessity for us to engage in the witness as the church formed by the Eucharist in the world. Our center is Jesus Christ, sent from the Father by the power of the Holy Spirit, incarnate two thousand years ago in Palestine, and made really present among us by the Father's gift of the Spirit descending on the bread and the cup in the Eucharist, participated in by faith for those baptized.

I hope that this is not too confusing. I hope that it helps read the Scriptures. I will reverse the Scriptures here, starting with the Gospel. What was the purpose for the manna in the wilderness? What is that "manna" in Jesus' teaching? What is the relationship between Christ's incarnation and eating his flesh today? What is the result of eating Jesus as bread?

John 6:37-51

Start reading at the end: "I am the bread of life." Don't miss the Sacramental images or the images of feeding the hungry as a result.

Now go back and read the first part of the passage. Why did the Father send Jesus? What did the Father send Jesus as? For what end or purpose? What is objectionable about this? How does Jesus meet the objections?

Ephesians 4:(25-29)30-5:2

In our culture it is easy to read this as a list of rules -- which, in some way, they are. Yet it can be reduced as well to a certain type of "niceness". What is the role of truthfulness in the instructions? Why? Why should all work? What is "evil talk"?

If you notice, the passage presumes "bitterness and wrath and anger and wrangling and slander, together with all malice" is present, but needs to be "put away". Why is it to be put away (notice that it is about God in Christ to us, not for us). What is the most basic reality that provides the potential to live these instructions? What is the result of a congregation that might live this way? How would it handle disputes and conflicts?

Deuteronomy 8:1-10

Finally, what is the purpose of keeping the commandments? What must one remember? What is the role of remembering God's graciousness? What is the purpose of keeping these commandments? For us, what and where is the manna that is talked about in this passage after reading the Gospel passage.

Have a wonderful evening. If you want additional dialogue, let me know!

Posted by johnwright at August 9, 2006 11:24 AM

Comments

Wonderful reflections, Pastor John. I am reminded of L-M. Chauvet's book Symbol and Sacrament, where he connects the Eucharist as Christ's body to the manna in the wilderness in such a way as to highlight the "non-value" or even "non-status" of this particular and peculiar bread. With this bread, there is always just enough for everyone; it can never be turned into a commodity or be given value or serve relationships of trade or power: for if one tries to take more than one needs, it turns putrid. This bread points to a kindgom economy that has no parallel in this world apart from the "liturgical city" (to use C. Pickstock's phrase). Indeed, the Eucharist makes the church; the bread of Christ nourishes the Church, metabolizing us into a communal (re-)presentation of the physical body of Christ in/to the world. Thanks for sharing these insights, which have such implications for our scriptural understanding and communal-liturgical practice.

[Hope you don't mind, but I think I'll link to this post over at our blog.]

Posted by: Brannon Hancock at August 12, 2006 11:11 AM

Dearest One,

I am, Miss Lisa Bedard, from Sierra Leone. The Only child of late Mr & Mrs
Bedard Tureh. Who passed away some years ago

Before the death of my father he gave me the covering documents of the fund deposited in a security company, as I am his only daughter and he so much loved me that was why he made me the beneficiary of the trunk box containing the Sum of $17.000.000,.million dollars. When my late father was his alive he told me that I have to look for a foreign investment partner that will help me to receive the box from the security company.

I came to Cote D' Ivories were my late father told me that he deposited the trunk box, to look for the security company here in Abidjan West African.

After some days I found the company, but the problem I am having now is that the director of the security company make me to understand that the trunk box is not here, Because of the war and political crises that is going on in this country which know body knows what will be the out come of it. That is why they have taken it to their branch office in UK,

The director of the security company makes me to understand that my late father made an Agrrment with the security company in the documents that I should look for foreign investment, so now am looking for a foreign investment partner, some one who have the far of God, honey and trust person that will assist me.

I wish if you can assist me and get the trunk box out from the security company in UK, and transfer the fund to your Account so that you will help me to join you in you country and invest the money into any viable sector in your country; for me to start up a new life with you immediately the fund gets to you.

1. To start a better life again and as well further my education.

3. Meanwhile 15% of the total funds will be for you, for your Assistance.

I will wait to hear from you to tell you more on what to do, please include your telephone and fax number on your reply.
Best Regards,
Miss Lisa Bedard T

Posted by: Miss Lisa Bedard at April 4, 2007 3:57 AM