![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
« Wisdom from Henri De Lubac | Main | Third Sunday of Pentecost: June 25th » June 13, 2006
Second Sunday of Pentecost
After Trinity Sunday, our readings now take us into "normal times" -- what in the medieval world was called the "saeculum" -- the time between the times of Christ's comings. If you look in that world, one understands that the contemporary English word, "secular", is embedded in the earlier Latin term. It is interesting how the logic of "the secular" has come into dominate us, even in the church. Our passages for this Sunday are interesting to read in light of this difference. As Christians, we believe that the "secular", a realm of pure nature that humans can understood without reference to God,does not exist. All things find their beginning and end in God, including ourselves. This does not mean that we collapse God into the world to measure our significance by our impact in the world -- 'co-writing history' with God. This is the mistake of all "relational theologies" -- and as we will see in the passage, it leads us to very profound difficulties -- and pulls us into the secular, rather than living in faithful live in the saeculum. Ezekiel 31:1-6,10-14 A little background on the literal background that provides the basis for the spiritual sense of this passage. In the 8th through 7th centuries, Assyria had stretched out into the first real empire that the world had seen. In the later 7th century, Assyria weakened, and Egypt joined with them to form an alliance. Assyria fell to the Babylonians -- its populace and superstructure was utterly destroyed. Egypt hoped to become the one "big stick" on the block. What does the prophet think about these aspirations? To what and whom does he compare Egypt? What is the lesson from the images? Are these images something for the Egyptians to imitate? Why or why not? What was the ultimate significance or meaning of Assyria? Is it in its accomplishments, its ability to be "significant" or "make history"? If Assyria plays a certain "type" found in the world today, both for human groups and individuals, where is it found? How is it a danger for us as individuals and a congregation? In this passage, we find a fascinating glimpse about the relationship between our life in this world -- what Paul calls "the earthly tent" and our eternal end in God. Can you discuss the relationship between this earthly tent and our heavenly dwelling? Which is more basic, important, fundamental? Does this make the "earthly tent" insignificant -- should we wish to be "unclothed"? Is our heavenly end, the Triune God, a movement into or away from life? What does that say about the life we live now? Is it important? Is it the most important? How does that free us to live now? What then is our goal, our end, our purpose or significance or meaning? Concerning what is the judgment of Christ? What does that mean about our life in the body? Why then must we walk in faith, not sight? What is significant about our lives? What is significant about others? Mark 4:26-34 Why is the kingdom of God like someone who scatters seed but does not know how it grows? Does this person take control of the situation? What type of farmer would you call such a one? Responsible or irresponsible? How is bringing about the harvest? How big is the mustard plant? How does it compare to the image of the tree from Ezekiel? Whom lives in it? How significant is the plant?
Henri de Lubac in the work, A Brief Catechism on Nature and Grace writes, "Jesus did not come to establish a social program that would result in 'a better world'; not that he condemns the search for such a program, but his mission belongs to a different order, and whoever rejects that mission will in th eend make the former search vain" (p. 166). What do you think about this quote as an interpretation of these passages? Why would that "different order" make the "former search vain"? Posted by johnwright at June 13, 2006 1:03 PM Comments
Post a comment
|
Archives
Recent Entries
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||