![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
« Acts 9:20-25: The Chaser becomes the Chasee | Main | Acts 9:26-31: Protective Custody » December 5, 2005
Second Sunday of Advent
Yesterday's sermon was hard to give. As I look back over it, it was probably hard to hear as well. To speak of that which is to come is difficult, without a whole lot of stutterings and qualifications. Yet I am more and more convinced that the way forward is by returning to the very roots of the Christian tradition, rather than learning to translate it into contemporary language and categories. We have to understand our lives fundamentally different for the Spirit to shape us. To live so that justice and the baptism with the Holy Spirit, the sanctification of believers, are the same thing is a fundamental mission for our ocngregation as we live in connection with the Church of the Nazarene. This is what happens when we return both to their proper setting within the Scriptures and the history of the church. The sermon struggles to find a way of speaking outside the malformations that the politics that a liberal society places upon the church to return justice to its home within a Christian language of the Spirit's sanctifying work in our lives. Your comments and observations, either about its oral version yesterday, or written here, are always welcome. Second Sunday of Advent 2005 Isaiah 40:1-11 As I prepared for this week, the passage from 2 Peter wouldn’t leave me. I tried – after all, it’s 2 Peter. I love Isaiah 40 – it is one of the most beautiful passages in Scriptures. The Gospel reading focuses on John the Baptist. It speaks of Jesus’ coming to baptize with the Holy Spirit – a very important phrase within the tradition of the Church of the Nazarene. But I couldn’t get away from 2 Peter. I’d like to begin there, move to the Gospel, so that we can hear the Word of God in Isaiah 40 this morning. But let’s begin with the 2 Peter passage. The passage speaks of our hope – a new heavens, a new earth, where justice is at home. End times speculation is rampant within certain segments of American Christianity. People support wars in the Middle East, even the practical elimination of Christians from the land where Jesus walked, on the basis of new readings of the bible outside the tradition of the church, the saints who’ve gone before. The text speaks of Christ’s coming like a thief in the night – by definition, unpredictable. The texts speaks of a melting, a dissolving of the elements – language taken from popular philosophy of the time for a cataclysmic ending to the world. The language describes the indescribable – the culmination of all things, a rift in time that lies ahead, a time not brought about by human efforts, but by God, as creation, a new heavens, a new earth that finds its true life in God; a new heavens that finds its true being in God. In advent we look forward to that which is absolutely future, and thus, utterly unpredictable, utterly free because it is absolutely in God. The text speaks of a future irruption of a world where justice is at home. On the basis of the Incarnation and Resurrection of Christ, we boldly proclaim the coming irruption of justice into the world where justice really is at home. You know, kick off your shoes, put on the shorts, wrap up in a blanket at home. In the in-coming age, God will bring forth the world as it really is in God. Justice does not come slowly through human effort -- state run economies, free market global capitalism, United Nation’s policy or First World Colonialism. It will come only from God and in God. 2 Peter speaks of our hope: in a rift in history, a rift already seen in the incarnation of God in Jesus Christ, when God will bring forth a creation where justice is at home. "And everything will be revealed." Justice emerges as the revelation of what really is. The real truth, goodness, and beauty of all things become evident. No more Fox News, no more reporting on weapons of mass destruction by the New York Times or the Washington Post. No more personal arguments over whose interpretation really describes reality. All these things will be dissolved. Everything will be revealed. Good news! Yet it raises a certain question: What sort of persons ought we to be?
As soon as we mention God bringing forth justice, a massive cultural gap arises within the sanctuary. We live in a world that doesn’t even know how to talk about justice. Shoot, I don’t know how to speak of justice. The whole concept of justice seems impossible to me, an impossible possibility that even now breaks into our world only by the gift of the Spirit in glimpses of what is to come, like in the gaze of an infant into the face of her mother, even as the mother smiles back. I see it, but before I can name it, comprehend it, put it into words, it seems gone. I just don’t know justice. But this I do know. A Christian account of justice differs from what our modern society teaches us. Unlike the New Testament, we’ve learned that there is justice on one side, a public side, and righteousness on another, a private side. We can’t even speak of justice any more; we have to speak of social justice, the formulation of policy the right way for the society in the right way. Righteousness is private, personal, basically being nice, upholding the main moral tenets of society: don’t cheat, tell the truth, don’t make waves, drink and have sex responsibly, pay your taxes, support the troops, and don’t use coarse language. By dividing righteousness from justice, the private from the public, by thinking that the world can ever be just without just people, and that it is possible to have just people without a society committed to justice, we will only contribute to the domination of sin in the world and in our lives. We won’t be the sort of people that we ought to be in light of God’s coming, the advent of justice in the advent of Christ by centering our lives on social justice or personal righteousness. The text uses different words to speak of who we ought to be to prepare for the coming: holiness and godliness. How old fashioned! How backward! I don’t know. These terms presuppose that the problem with the world today, the problem of our lives, is sin, the absence of holiness, the absent of godliness. Injustice is itself sin-ful – full of the nothingness that is the lessening of God’s creation. And yes, sin makes its nothingness evident. Sin duplicates its perversion by persons who seek to profit from the lack, like a pimp profits from the perversion of sex through controlling the body of a prostitute, through arranging relationships to support the perversion. We as followers of Jesus Christ cannot support a lack, the nothing. But we have to recognize, as moral, as righteous, as committed to justice, to righteousness that we are, that the nothingness that is sin cuts through our lives. We don’t see justice fully. We don’t see humanity fully except through Jesus Christ, Incarnate and Coming. To commit to justice, to commit to righteousness, without this commitment traveling through and staying within Jesus Christ will lead to being coopted by the very nothing that sucks out the goodness of the creation that God has brought forth. To live justly, to love mercy, to walk humbly with our God, to live and prepare for the coming, to be the sort of people that we ought to be, our call is to holiness, to godliness, to a cleansing of the sin within us so that we might witness to the fullness of life, of creation that will come over all things in the coming of Christ, the coming of God, the coming of Justice. What sort of people ought we to be in preparation for the coming? A holy people, a kingdom of priests, a people cleansed from sin in order to live the coming. John came baptizing with water for the forgiveness of sins. Baptism is a cleansing, a bath. It is a means of purification to open one to the coming reign of God. Water baptism seals our faith by initiating us into God’s people through dying and being raised with Christ. It is a baptism for the forgiveness of sins. One receives water baptism only once, and we always live from our baptismal confession of faith as we live towards the future. In all that you do, remember your baptism and the life to which you are called through being initiated into a people, the church. Preparation for the coming of Christ reaches a first culmination at the font. If you have not repented of your sins, believed in Christ, and been enfolded through water into the body of Christ, you risk being unprepared for the Advent of God. Water baptism is for the forgiveness of sin. Yet Jesus comes baptizing with the Holy Spirit. Like water baptism, the baptism of the Spirit is a cleansing of sin. But sin here is inward, the absence of who God created us to be as human beings made in the image of God for God, a life lived in love of God and neighbor. The baptism of Christ, the baptism of the Spirit, is the perfecting of who we really are in God, the removal of the perversions, the lies that have become encoded into our bodies, a perfecting by the coming of Christ by the power of the Spirit. The baptism of the Spirit immerses our bodies in God as water baptism immerses our bodies in water. Living in the Spirit of Jesus Christ, the Spirit works continuously, re-forming us from the nothingness that distorts our perspectives, pulls us into conflicts that don’t matter, the patterns of falseness that rip at our bodies and the bodies of others. Unlike water baptism, we don’t come up for air, but we learn to breathe in the Holy Spirit, the breath of God. We live for the coming of God in the Spirit, continuously, every second, time and time again, the coming of the very Love that is God to make us who we really are. The baptism of the Spirit prepares for the coming of God, the coming of Justice, because it is the coming of God, the coming of justice, into our lives, a coming that will reach its fullness in the advent of Christ as the advent of the new creation, where justice is at home. The baptism of the Spirit is the baptism of Jesus. The baptism of the Spirit cleanses us, fills us. Therefore, we engage in the works of Christ, what we have come to call the works of mercy, feeding the hungry, giving drink to the thirsty, clothing the naked, visiting the imprisoned, giving shelter to the homeless, staying with the sick, burying the dead as part of a particular people, a congregation pulled together by the Spirit in Jesus Christ. This personal involvement, an involvement that sees that people are people, not causes, helps us hear the nothingness that is injustice, that shows how that nothingness has come to our lives, rather than always looking to blame others for everything. The works of mercy done in the Spirit bring forth repentance, and therefore cleansing and holiness and godliness that prepares not only us, but all of creation, for the coming of God, the coming of justice into the world in the coming of Christ. The baptism of the Spirit takes us beyond social justice and personal righteousness to holiness, to godliness, the constant in-coming of God through the Spirit in our lives that forms us as a whole into the body of Christ in the world. This is our witness to the kingdom of God, the kingdom of justice that God will bring to the world at its consummation! The baptism of the Spirit prepares us for the coming of God, the impossible possibility of the coming of the new creation, where justice is at home.
Posted by johnwright at December 5, 2005 9:15 AM Comments
John, A couple of questions. First, about the 2 Peter 3:10 passage, the NRSV says: "...and the earth and everything that is done on it will be disclosed." The NIV says: "...and the earth and everything in it will be laid bare." The NRSV has a footnote saying "Other ancient authorities read will be burned up" and the NIV has a similar one saying "Some manuscripts be burned up." This seems to be exactly the opposite of "all will be revealed." Is there some sort of NT debate on what is really said here, or does consulting the Greek shed some light on this? Before I ask my next question, I want to first say that I very much agree with what you are saying here concerning justice and Christian language. What I want to ask, though, is your thoughts on similar critiques of Christian tradition. I was just reading John R. Franke's account of Origen in The Character of Theology: An Introduction To Its Nature, Task, and Purpose, and in it he cites Origen as one who used the linguistic tools of his time to speak the Christian message to them. In this case, it was a distinctively Hellenistic, Platonist environment. Franke's point is that we as Christians always have to recognize our cultural situatedness and be creative to use the tools to speak to our particular place in history. He is careful to warn about being too accomodated to the times (i.e. being patriotic as a Christian to show to not be accomodated to the Nation State). Our theology will always come out of a particular time in history, and it will be shaped by who we are and where we are, but at the same time, we must speak and act accordingly to the global church and therefore let such things as the church catholic and Scripture as the norming norm discipline our theology and lives together in the Christian community. On the other hand, he does mention that Origen was branded as a heretic by many, yet he still maintains that he remained faithful to the Christian witness, doing what he could to preach the Gospel. Is being distinctively Christian and recognizing our cultural situatedness reconcilable, or no? Thoughts from John or anybody? The same nothingness of sin you mention that tries to take over our lives tries to take over my own as well. I hate it and long for the consummation. There's a discussion going along similar lines of what I just brought up On Historicism at the Generous Orthodoxy: ThinkTank blog. Peace, Eric Posted by: Eric Lee at December 5, 2005 12:11 PM Eric: Indeed, there is a textual variant in 3:10 between two really different Greek words, one to be discovered, judged; the other to "burn up." It seems to me that the NIV, with its evangelical neo-apocalyptic background, takes the confliguration imagery as primary. The NRSV reading seems to have a bit more manuscript evidence (although the other has substantial evidence in early texts as well), and reads the text in light of the judgment motif within the passage. I followed the standard academic reconstruction now; if you notice, the NIV even changes from the King James -- probably for neo-apocalyptic purposes. Your second point is interesting. Actually in the sermon I am reading the Christian apocalpytic hope of the coming of justice in terms given to me by Jacque Derrida (there are some hidden quotes from "Deconstruction in a Nutshell actually). Derrida has helped me see the apocalyptic status of our lives that seems to be indicated by such texts. The sermon also is heavily indebted to some of the critique of modernity by Alasdair MacIntyre, and positively, by a conversation with Craig Keen in Philadelphia. I cannot take myself out of my history of conversations that the text becomes part of. The issue is what conceptuality, what polity shapes the fundamental contours of that discourse. My criticism is a criticism of the distortion of liberalism that arises out of modernity, a modernity that continues without end in some post-modern discourses. I think that there is something very pastoral at stake here, both within the experience of the Spirit within the congregation and for the long term mission of the congregation. Liberal discourses understanding of justice does not acknowledge God; therefore, it cannot be justice. Yet we have to engage the unjust structures of the world around us, but I want to be careful because those structures, insofar as they are, are good. The problem is what they are not! I just don't think that we as a congregation can live by what we are against. We have to be against because we are for! Justice itself is such a loaded term in the world that makes it much harder to retrieve than holiness. We can substitute one unjust situation by another unjust situation in the name of justice, so it seems to me. This is very hard to do by the Spirit's work to make us holy!! Both Bush and Chavez can use the language of justice to justify their agendas -- I don't hear either one invoking the language of holiness!!! The only way to escape the tyranny of the present, I am convinced, is to keep our ties explicit and open to the past. This is not a very protestant way. This, I think, is the problem with protestantism -- it is so deeply embedded in modernity and its program to translate Christian language into another "more relevant" language. That is what I am trying to resist in the sermon, even while saying that God has a wonderful work in our lives to do . . . if we will engage it under the work of the Holy Spirit who is the Spirit of Christ, the Gift, Love itself. Thanks for the good comments!! Posted by: John Wright at December 5, 2005 12:43 PM Post a comment
|
Archives
Recent Entries
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||