V. 8 introduces Stephen as an individual character for the first time. He was given prominence of place by being listed first of the seven in v. 5. For fun -- and to see the irony in the events to follow -- after reading v. 8, turn to Deuteronomy 34:10-12 and read it. What do you notice about the relationship between Moses and Stephen? Among whom are "the people" that Stephen does his "great signs and wonders"? Is he contesting Judaism and Moses or working within them?

Vv. 9-12. Why would it be this particular synagogue that would get in a dispute with Stephen? Why would they not like him? How does it relate to his assignment to distribute food and his engagement in the works of mercy? What does the church's active engagement with the works of mercy do? Maybe you could imaginatively discuss the nature of the Spirit and wisdom by which Stephen spoke? Why would they not be strong enough to refute Stephen?

V. 13-14 How does their inability to refute Stephen lead to their deceitful employment of false witnesses? Why would they accuse him of speaking against the Temple and the Law? What is it in the distribution of goods and loyalty to Jesus that would make Stephen vulnerable to the charges? Is it true? How does this relate to Stephen doing "great signs and wonders"? Why would they accuse Jesus of destroying the temple and changing Jewish customs?

V. 15: How does Stephen respond? Why do their words not upset him? Who is judging whom?

It might be good to talk about Stephen's response to the accusations, and what convictions and virtues one must have to respond in a similar manner to such an event. What does his demeanor have to do with his assignment? How can we open ourselves to God's grace to be so shaped? Why is this important for our witness?

Have a good night!