« "Psycho Christians!" | Main | Whoops »

August 10, 2005
Acts 5:12-21: Perceptions of the Life of the Jerusalem Church

I'm trying to finish up my paper for my trip to the conference on Judah and Judeans in the Fourth Century in Muenster, Germany. Through a comparison with some late Babylonian temple texts, I'm looking at the temple sacrificial system as a type of economic redistribution of wealth. Temples in antiquity are like huge catering services! One text from a place called Uruk talks about 10 sheep being cooked at one of the four meal services of each day. If this same amount was provided the other three times, that butchering and preparing forty sheep a day. That's lots of lamb chops!!

What's that have to do with Acts 5:12-21? Maybe a little more than my story about Grandpa Wright last week -- then again, maybe not!! But the text presupposes a temple system where the high priest controlled the economic exchange of goods through the temple -- the flow of wealth. From what we can tell, during this time the high priest oversaw this flow of wealth to make sure it benefited the elite in Jerusalem. This gives a background to the different perceptions on the church that this passage depicts.

The passage seems to suggest four different groups:
(1) believers in Jesus the Messiah and members of this Jewish messianic new age under the authority of the apostles.
(2) persons being initiated into this people as a result of the witness of the apostles and others.
(3) persons curious but afraid to be associated with the new Jewish messianists, except to receive benefits from them.
(4) The high priest and his associates who attempt to stop the spread of this Jewish messianic movement.

Maybe you can read through the passage and see what group appears where. Do you find any patterns of differences between them?

Read vv. 12-13: Why would the apostles and the church, meeting in the temple, have people's respect, yet at the same time, the same people not be willing to join them?

V. 14: Given this context, what is it to be a believer? What is the difference between the believers adn the "esteemers"?

Vv. 15-16: Why is the healing witness of the Peter so important? Is to be healed to become a believer? What is the point of the healings?

Vv. 17-18: Why are the high priests and their associates upset at the apostles? (don't forget to look back to chapter 4) Why do the high priest resort to coercion? What type of coercion do they use? Why?

Vv. 19-21: What "good" does the coercion of the high priest do? Where are the apostles when the high priest calls for them in prison? What does that imply about where the priestly officials are not? Who is more faithful to the temple of the Lord, the God of Israel?


The passage raises issues about the perception of the church, and its relationship to various different groups outside it. How do you think different people perceive you, and us as a congregation? What do people who do not really "believe" want from us? Does the church hold this back in Jerusalem? Who perceives you/us as a problem, or a threat? Why is this so? What does the passage suggest is our mission in such a situation?

If you still have time, maybe you can speculate more why I told the story about the dog and the apple butter. If you find out, let me know!! Have a wonderful evening together!

Posted by johnwright at August 10, 2005 2:18 PM


Comments

Top Reasons Why John Used the Apple Butter Story

5. In the midst of a bunch of Wrights, one can still have a wrong.

4. Purpose is revealed through the message derived by the following formula:
14th letter + 16th letter + 21st letter + 33rd letter - 8th letter of alphabet + 6th sentence + 26th and 27th word = WAR IS A DISASTER

3. It is a subliminal message encouraging Carl (clearly the shaggy dog) to cut the 'do.

2. John identifies with the dog in this story. The world has slammed on the brakes and John has found himself in a bowl of apple butter.

And the number one reason for the apple butter story is...

1. In order to immanentize the eschatological vision of canine-like devotion, John offers a physiognomatic portrayal of the martyred dog to spur on the devotion of the faithful in various ways.

Posted by: Group ID: LA/PB/PL/TAL at August 13, 2005 11:57 AM

In response to your question, "Why would the apostles and the church, meeting in the temple, have people's respect, yet at the same time, the same people not be willing to join them?"

It's because they're idealists who would rather not live in obedience to God, but simply affirm what is right in their heads as propositions. Looks like the concept of "cheap grace" has been around for a very, very long time. As Bonhoeffer instructs, "those who have faith, obey" cannot be affirmed without simultaneously affirming "those who obey, have faith."

~

I'm really, really curious as to who posted the comment above! Not many people I know are familiar with that kind of language! Intriguing! And also, to know Pastor John enough to capitalize on his "in various ways" mannerism in speech! Brilliant!

Unmask thyself "Group ID: LA/PB/PL/TAL"! :)

curious,

eric

Posted by: Eric Lee at August 18, 2005 11:46 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)




September 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            


Archives
Recent Entries
Books:

Telling God's Story

Conflicting Allegiances: The Church-based University In A Liberal Democratic Society

Reading Assignments:


Recommended Reading:

Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity





Powered by
Movable Type 3.31