![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
« Brief Reflections on John Paul II | Main | Reading on the Theological Implications of Consumerism » April 13, 2005
Influential Intellectual?
Okay, the blog business is a little tougher than I thought. I'm finding it hard to keep too it. So I'm going to be a little more "stream of consciousness". Maybe I can blog more consistently this way. Yesterday we received our Time Magazine -- typical corporate press. They like publishng "lists" -- I guess it is a Letterman thing. Anyways, this week was the top 100 most influential people. They organize in various categories, one of which is "Scientists and Intellectuals." Of course, as an academic, pastor, and theologian, I was interested. I opened the magazine so that I could keep up with what's going down. Who are the current intellectual movers and shakers? As far as Christians, I was really interested. Here is a underlying superstructure of the life of the church. While popular movements can sustain the witness for a while, I am convinced that there must be hard intellectual work for the ongoing vitality of the life of the church, work that engages the culture at very basic presuppositions. Occasionally we find someone like John Paul II who combines the two -- a serious, philosopher-theologian who also becomes a popular figure. As I thumbed through, there was one Christian "intellectual" mentioned -- Rick Warren of Purpose-Driven, Saddleback fame. I guess that he was considered an intellectual, not a scientist -- though it seems to me that scientist might be just as accurate a phrase. That Warren was placed there is a commentary on either culture, Time Magazine, the life of the church, or all of the above. Boy, do I waste my time!!! Here I am trying to read, study, teach, be faithful to the Christian tradition at its roots, understand its difference from contemporary secularity in its modern and post-modern forms, when what I need to be doing, so it seems, is learning to talk in a therapeutic, individualistic theo-religious self-help language, made for a conservative audience, but with underlying intellectual basis in Protestant thinkers like Paul Tillich. Fortunately, I am on this influential "intellectuals" email list. So, in closing, I will just cut and paste an email, unedited, that I received from Saddleback and "Pastor Rick" this week. It shows the depth of intellectual insight and acumen that the contemporary culture demands of its theological, intellectual leaders: Dear Saddleback Attenders, Posted by johnwright at April 13, 2005 7:29 AM Comments
Post a comment
|
Archives
Recent Entries
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||